Subject: Re: [xsl] Yet Another Flat File to Hierarchy question.. From: "Kurt Cagle" <cagle@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:37:34 -0700 |
In the Microsoft parser, xsl:key operations are performed before a context is instantiated (for performance reasons, according to the implementer). That's one of the big reasons I avoid use of xsl:key, at least in the MSXML implementations. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Cohagan" <bill.cohagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:02 AM Subject: RE: [xsl] Yet Another Flat File to Hierarchy question.. > I think the problem you're seeing is related to the problem I described in > my recent post regarding xsl:key semantics and MSXML. First, a good test > would be to try your case using Saxon 6.5.2 which appears to "do the right > thing" with the call to current(), at least for my testcase. I believe > earlier versions do not. MSXML (any version) does NOT do the right thing as > far as I can tell. (Xalan may also be a way to test your case. I understand > that it works properly too.) > > Regards, > Bill > > -----Original Message----- > From: McNally, David [mailto:David.McNally@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:56 PM > To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: RE: [xsl] Yet Another Flat File to Hierarchy question.. > > For some reason I can't get current() to work in key definitions - or at > least that seems to be what the problem is. Using the suggested key below, > I tried this xslt: > > <snip> > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Yet Another Flat File to , Bill Cohagan | Thread | RE: [xsl] Yet Another Flat File to , Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Yet Another Flat File to , McNally, David | Date | Re: [xsl] Xalan Transformation Erro, Carsten Klein |
Month |