Subject: Re: [xsl] Hello World From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:02:38 +0100 |
the smallest,yes but some non-conformant xslt processors, or older processors sometimes choke on the it. *gasp* it is true . howdy all ! cheers, jim fuller ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:42 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] Hello World > > > What would be the simplest possible XSL "Hello World" that > > eliminates as many possible sources of failure as possible? > > probably this is the smallest hello world stylesheet: > > <html xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xsl:version="1.0">Hello World</html> > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Hello World, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Hello World, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] <xsl:for-each select="$my, Vasu Chakkera | Date | Re: [xsl] <xsl:for-each select="$my, David Carlisle |
Month |