Subject: Re: [xsl] count string-length without white-space and breaking if white-space exists after 126 characters From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:14:05 +0100 |
> I always figured that given the scoping rules of xsl:variable it > shouldn't require as many resources as xsl:param. > ...Any opinion as to whether there are likely performance gains? The scoping rules are the same for param and variable. There are very few situations where you have a choice of which to use. If you need to pass in a value from outside then it has to be a parameter. If you need to set bind teh variable at any place other than the top level of a stylesheet or template you have to use variable. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] count string-length witho, bryan | Thread | RE: [xsl] count string-length witho, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] count string-length witho, bryan | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:copy producing ugly o, McNally, David |
Month |