Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT & SQL From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:44:02 +0100 |
> But there's the rub; SQL 92 and 96 own their own are not Turing > complete... Yes I saw your reply after I sent mine. OK then the answer is no. Either way it's not that interesting. as the differences between languages is really what they make easy not what they make possible. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT & SQL, Hunsberger, Peter | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT & SQL, Jim Melton |
[xsl] XPath iteration?, Derek Davies | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath iteration?, David Carlisle |
Month |