Subject: Re: Finding the closest node (was Re: [xsl] inconsistent Preceding-Sibling behaviour when nested in For-Each From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:06:24 GMT |
> What if I want to get the closest of some possible (specific) subset of > ancestors? eg (this is Docbook, let us say the current node is an <xref> > in a <para> at some depth within one of the following): just put ( )[last()] around teh union that you ststed. > XPath returns the remotest node (the earliest in document order) The Xpath as written selects all teh ancestors of that type, not just the first. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Finding the closest node (was R, G. Ken Holman | Thread | RE: [xsl] Sorry about the wrong sub, Américo Albuquerque |
RE: [xsl] JavaScript problem again!, Jarno . Elovirta | Date | Re: [xsl] generating entities in XS, David Carlisle |
Month |