Subject: RE: [xsl] The beginning of xslt? From: "Andy Joslin" <andy.joslin@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:12:31 -0000 |
Steven C Kienle wrote : >Actually, there are some companies which are starting to use PDFs as >web-based data entry forms, as opposed to (X)HTML forms. The goal is >to get what people use on the web to better look like what the paper >forms they are used to using. Of course, if browsers supported XSL:FO directly > then PDFs maybe wouldn't be becoming popular for this.... I think that there is definitely a need for greater typographical and design control of web-based interfaces than is currently allowed by XHTML/CSS. To use PDFs as interfaces to the web though is a retrograde step in my view, as PDF is a binary and proprietary format. It is also at the 'end of the line' in the production process and almost impossible to reuse/reflow at a later date (see the current PDF to XSL-FO thread) (David, I think this is what I meant when I said 'static'...) Much better to have something that is a standards-based open format (with support for XForms, DOM events, etc.) David Carlisle wrote: > Yes all I really meant to suggest that perhaps the route to a "Fo > based browser" is to strengthen the "web-like features" of systems > traditionally thought of as "print preview" rather than to try to > graft FO functionality onto a system with an HTML history. Not sure that enhanced or extended PDF viewing is the answer though. I agree that there has been too much 'grafting' of browser technologies historically, so I wouldn't necessarily advocate doing that either. I guess that it would just be nice to feed some of the typographical/design flexibility that FO offers into future versions of XHTML. Perhaps by XHTML v.5 we'll be somewhere to having a print quality web experience ;-) Andy ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail and its attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please telephone or e-mail us immediately, delete this message from your system and do not read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use this e-mail message and any attachments. Although ri3k Limited believes this e-mail and any attachments to be free of any virus or other defect which may affect your computer, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and ri3k Limited does not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage in any way from its use. ri3k Limited Registered in England: 10-12 Ely Place, London, EC1N 6RY Company Number: 3909745 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] The beginning of xslt?, DPawson | Thread | [xsl] string processing, Mclean, Patrick |
[xsl] RE: [xml-dev] SAX startDocume, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] How to count attributes?, Sorin Marti |
Month |