Subject: RE: [xsl] qualitative decline of xsl-list questions From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 08:17:19 -0000 |
Tom said: > One thing is that debugging xslt problems takes some > experience, and can seem rather different than debugging, > say, javascript. In practice, I have found that as I get > better at diagnosing my xslt problems, I have gotten better > at debugging javascript and python too. I think that you > need to apply more flexibility for diagnosing and correcting > xslt problems and enhancing that ability is useful everywhere else. If people would like to recount their debugging experiences and methods, I'll collate them for the faq? regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] qualitative decline of xs, Martinez, Brian | Thread | RE: [xsl] debugging techniques [was, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Reusable XSLT templates, Cams Ismael | Date | [xsl] nbsp (in parameter) question, Jitu |
Month |