Subject: RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative to Location of Style Sheet From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:59:48 -0000 |
> At 2002-12-06 07:03 -0800, Robert Koberg wrote: > >I just tried to google 'xpath 2 relax ng schema' and did not come up > >with anything meaningfull, so i would like to display my > ignorance and > >ask - why use W3C Shema? I assume becuase RNG came out > later. Is there > >any interoperability between the two different schema > languages(?) in > >XPath 2? If I like RNG, will I > >be able to use that in/for/with(?) XPath2? > No problem. RNG is simply a validation language. It doesn't change the data model, it either lets it through or not. So if XPath 2.0 supports typeless documents (which it does) then it also supports documents that have passed RNG validation. I think people are actually making far too much fuss about this. I don't personally think that all the type-related work that's gone into XPath 2.0 is worth the effort that's been put into it, but apart from delaying the spec, I don't think it does any harm at all to people who don't want to use it. And whatever the impression here and on xml-dev might be, the fact is that there are a great many people investing very heavily in XML Schema. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative , G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Locating Things Relative , David Rosenborg |
RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative , Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative , G. Ken Holman |
Month |