Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSL] extracting a verse From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:58:13 GMT |
> Yep, but it's only better at representing the structure, not (yet) at > manipulating it. well since you'll have nothing else to do over the hols, I look forward to seeing LMST transformation language in the new year... sniff ... geek.. sniff... [verse}No! penury, inertness and grimace,{verse] Grr it's so annoying that LNMML has the braces reversed like this, it makes it a pain to use in a brace matching editor, or with eyes that are just over-accustomed to jumping to a matching brace. If it was [verse{No! penury, inertness and grimace,}verse] it would be so much prettier:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSL] extracting a verse, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSL] extracting a verse, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] [XSL] extracting a verse, bryan | Date | Re: [xsl] [XSL] extracting a verse, Jeni Tennison |
Month |