Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing the name of parent node From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:20:32 GMT |
> What do I have instead of @attr when I want to test the nodes name (is this > called "basename"). to test this node, test="self::basename" or test="name(.)='basename'" (The first is better in most cases) to test the parents name test="parent::basename" or test="name(...)='basename'" David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Testing the name of paren, Joerg Heinicke | Thread | RE: [xsl] Testing the name of paren, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Testing the name of paren, Joerg Heinicke | Date | Re: [xsl] single display of double , Heiko Specht |
Month |