Subject: Re: [xsl] Yet Another Entity Ref question! From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:02:22 -0500 |
But I ask to myself (and to you): "Does it exist a method of outputting & in resulting doc without using d-o-e, so that I can use my originally solution?" Yes I know, I'm asking for outputting a non-well-formed XML doc!!
Yes probably, to use original solution, the only way is using d-o-e in xsl:text and xsl:value-of.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Yet Another Entity Ref qu, Marco Guazzone | Thread | RE: [xsl] Yet Another Entity Ref qu, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] single display of double , G. Ken Holman | Date | RE: [xsl] Yet Another Entity Ref qu, Wendell Piez |
Month |