Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)

Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:40:43 -0500
Michael Kay wrote:

Actually it's probably just as well that participating in the standards process is so expensive (more in time and expenses than in W3C membership fees, incidentally). If more people took part, the process would take even longer, and the specs would be even more complicated.


Therefore, if you did it yourself, we'd have it quicker and it would be better. Might work!



-- -------------------------- Jeff Kenton DataPower Technology, Inc.



XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread