Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)

Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:02:17 -0500
Is w3c in a hurry? It would seem that a body to promote useful standards might be better off going back and solving the pig problem first (especially when there's already a solution out there begging to be used).

simon

On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 12:41 PM, Michael Kay wrote:

Actually, as we get closer to finishing, I'm getting more and more
convinced that people will find the stronger typing useful, although I
was very sceptical when we started. Yes, XML Schema is a pig, but it
turns out you can live with it if you avoid looking at it too closely,
and that is what large numbers of people are in fact doing.

---
www.simonwoodside.com


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread