RE: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0

Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
From: Américo Albuquerque <aalbuquerque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:09:16 -0000

Hi.

> I have the feeling that a group of people has the goal of 
> making XSLT a ridiculous language.
> 
> 

If they are, they only make that most users continue to use xslt1.0 and
that xslt2.0 might have the same fate of the xslt1.1


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0, (continued) Michael Kay - Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:10:09 -0000 bryan - Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:54:50 +0100 Gunther Schadow - Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:15:48 -0500 Dimitre Novatchev - Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:30:26 +0100 Américo Albuquerque - Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:09:16 -0000 <= J.Pietschmann - Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:24:14 +0100 Jim Melton - Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:54:27 -0700 S Woodside - Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:17:54 -0500 Dimitre Novatchev - Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:30:31 +0100

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
[xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type, Dimitre Novatchev	Thread	Re: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden , J.Pietschmann
Re: [xsl] MS XML 3.0 and 4.0 noncon, gutman	Date	Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Can one _generate, Joseph Kesselman
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home