Re: [xsl] A very basic question.

[S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday, February 24, 2003, at 09:19  PM, Mike Brown wrote:

> S Woodside wrote:
> > Also I found Jclark's explanation to be unelightening.
>
> Interesting. The moment of epiphany for me was when I saw his 
> unofficial
> notation for what he was at the time calling a "universal name" (now
> "expanded-name"):
>
>   <cars:part xmlns:cars="http://www.cars.com/xml"/>
>   maps to
>   <{http://www.cars.com/xml}part/>
>
> I kind of wish they had gone ahead and allowed the latter syntax.

Maybe that was the problem... IIRC jclark's explanation doesn't quite 
match reality?

simon

--
www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list