Re: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:14:59 -0500
You mean something like XSLT 1.5?!

Simon

On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 04:24 PM, J.Pietschmann wrote:

Why can't we have xsl:result-document, xsl:function, a
bunch of useful XPath functions and get rid of RTF without
all the NEW! and ENHANCED! PSVI dependent and other
grammar-changing XPath stuff? I can't see much of a
dependency.

--
     anti-spam: do not post this address publicly
www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread