Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: A proposal:xsl:result-document asynchronous attribute From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:08:53 +0100 |
>I've seen some examples recently where initializing a Java object >requires two calls: a constructor and an initialization. ><xsl:variable name="x" select="java:object.new()"/> ><xsl:do select="setProperty($x,17)"/> ><xsl:value-of select="$x"/> for some reason, probably my own ingrained apocalypticism, this seems to me to be a worse threat than xsl:script ever was. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: A proposal:xsl:result, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] A proposal:xsl:result-doc, Kurt Cagle |
RE: [xsl] Which is more efficient?, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Wrapping text in XSL-FO t, Oleg Tkachenko |
Month |