Subject: RE: [xsl] should book answers be posted to XSL List? (was Re: [xsl] Answers to review questions in "Beginning XSLT": Chapter 8) From: "Mike Rudolph" <mrudolph@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:06:10 -0600 |
I ordered Michael Kay's book and Jeni's book last week. They arrived today. I am not a 'budding plagiarist', but I do intend to review the answers after studying Jeni's text. Mike Rudolph -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lars Huttar Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:48 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] should book answers be posted to XSL List? (was Re: [xsl] Answers to review questions in "Beginning XSLT": Chapter 8) <snip> If we took this off-list, the benefit to me would remain almost the same, minus a choice comment or two from the gallery of experts. (There has been little response so far other than from Jeni.) Let me ask, then, whether there are others reading the list who are finding this exchange helpful, or think it would be helpful in the future. (Thanks Wendell for already weighing in.) If not, I'd be happy to take this off-list. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] should book answers be posted, Lars Huttar | Thread | Re: [xsl] Answers to review questio, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] matching when the attribu, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] seriously trivial question ab, Robert P. J. Day |
Month |