Subject: RE: [xsl] xpath question From: florian <csshsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 28 Mar 2003 15:06:20 +0100 |
hi! > A very strange structure if you don't mind me saying! i know.. its not really clear yet if im able to change it though : / > If you assume that the description nodes are in the same order as the equivalent column nodes > (which in your example is not the case!!) : thats the point. the description nodes are just in the same order as in the group nodes. since they relate together. the first child node in a group node would be an apple for example, so the first child node in the descriptions node, would have to be the description node for the apple. > It is not obvious in your example how the description elements relate to the column > elements other than the fact they have the same fruit...!?! > > A far better structure might be: > <root> > .. > <order> > <column name="orange" description="this is an orange"/> > <column name="apple" description="this is an apple"/> > </order> > .. > </root> that would be for sure the most simple solution. the problem is though that the description nodes and the order nodes are in real-life coming from two different xml documents. so i would have to kinda pack them together with xslt first, which would make things also kinda akward. : / ciao! florian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xpath question, Bryan Archer | Thread | RE: [xsl] xpath question, Bryan Archer |
Re: [xsl] xsl-fo: mixed page layout, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] Pattern Question, Kevin . Gutch |
Month |