Subject: Re: [xsl] Thank you Daniel & Brian... From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 09:50:10 +0100 |
> ...which I knew was right but had expected for > the above three to catch any such oops. They > did not, but the 3WC validator did. xalan (and any other XSLT engine) doesn't know _anything_ about HTML at all: it just generates the nodes that you specify so it won't catch any html errors. Neither mozilla nor IE use a validating HTML parser, they are designed to render any hand-authored junk that is thrown at them.... If you are generating XHTML rather than XML then the XML parser in mozilla is non validating, so also won't catch validation errors.. The XML parser in IE can validate if you turn on validation from script, but by default it is non validating, and by default the output of XSLT (even if specified as being xml) goes to the html parser not the xml one. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Thank you Daniel & Brian., Daniel Bibbens | Thread | [xsl] How to change element nodes c, Michael Liwanag |
RE: [xsl] position() returns double, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Javascript embedded in PDF wi, Matts Isuls |
Month |