Subject: RE: [xsl] performance when using document() function From: Rod Humphris - FLPTN <rod.humphris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:57:34 +0100 |
I recently used the document() function to pull in the output from twelve similar database tables (as xml) and merge them into one unified output with an xslt and saw no performance issues, if that helps. My bet is that it is not an issue compared to all the other ways to do it well or badly! I have noticed though that moving from msxml3 to msxml4 has halved execution times in some cases. Cheers Rod -----Original Message----- From: Stevenson Ngila [mailto:Stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 01 April 2003 10:38 To: Xsl-List@Lists. Mulberrytech. Com Subject: [xsl] performance when using document() function Does anyone know what the performance consequences are when using the document() function? Tips on improving performance are welcome. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. Unless expressly stated to the contrary, this email is not intended to give rise to a new, or affect an existing, contractual or other legal relationship.This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. The unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this email, or any other information contained or attached,is prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offence. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon as possible. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.focusdiy.co.uk _________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] performance when using do, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Referencing original root whe, Cams Ismael |
Re: [xsl] include css in xsl, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Fixing entities, Stuart Brown |
Month |