RE: [xsl] performance when using document() function

Subject: RE: [xsl] performance when using document() function
From: Rod Humphris - FLPTN <rod.humphris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:57:34 +0100
I recently used the document() function to pull in the output from twelve
similar database tables (as xml) and merge them into one unified output with
an xslt and saw no performance issues, if that helps. My bet is that it is
not an issue compared to all the other ways to do it well or badly!

I have noticed though that moving from msxml3 to msxml4 has halved execution
times in some cases.  

Cheers

Rod

-----Original Message-----
From: Stevenson Ngila [mailto:Stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 April 2003 10:38
To: Xsl-List@Lists. Mulberrytech. Com
Subject: [xsl] performance when using document() function


Does anyone know what the performance consequences are 
when using the document() function? 

Tips on improving performance are welcome.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________


________________________________________________________________
Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. Unless expressly stated to the contrary, this email is not intended to give rise to a new, or affect an existing, contractual or other legal relationship.This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. The unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this email, or any other information contained or attached,is prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offence.

If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon as possible.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.

www.focusdiy.co.uk
_________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread