Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:function From: "Kurt Cagle" <kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 22:11:55 -0700 |
Michael, Just wanted to drop a note saying that the Saxon 7.5 implementation looks good. One thing that did occur to me -- with the ability to specify data types now an intrinsic part of the language, I wonder if the two functions <xsl:function name="ol:func"> <xsl:param name="arg1" as="xs:integer"/> <h1>This is an integer</h1> </xsl:function> <xsl:function name="ol:func"> <xsl:param name="arg1" as="xs:string"/> <h1>This is a string</h1> </xsl:function> should in fact be considered the same thing (they are in the implementation and apparently the current spec) or whether in fact they have distinct signatures. Put another way, does the introductio of the as attribute make overloading of functional names a possibility? -- Kurt Cagle XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Thanks: Wrapping multiple ele, Steven Curry | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:function, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] how to display html data,, asim | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:function, Jeni Tennison |
Month |