Subject: RE: [xsl] Another lookup problem (well-formed vs. valid) From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 08:21:13 +0100 |
> I've been working with data that conforms to a DTD supplied by > my client, Now, they have asked that I use some data from an > additional source which does not conform with their DTD, though > it is parallel (I think) in that the IDs assigned for each entry > are equivalent. I think this is what architectural forms were designed for. HTH daveP *** snip here **** - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Another lookup problem (w, Passin, Tom | Thread | [xsl] Request and Submit within XML, schubrakete |
RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, David . Pawson | Date | Re: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, Jeni Tennison |
Month |