Subject: RE: [xsl] Pass node to template From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:36:50 +0100 |
> > Never Mind... I'm being a retard. ... > > Things would have been much better if I had remembered to change number=3 > on the command line to string=3 Two good examples here of why it's good language design to be rather stricter about error checking. Type checking of course comes into this category as well. The "anything goes" style of XSLT 1.0 is great when you get things right, but can be a pig to debug when you get things wrong. Note that XSLT 2.0 allows you to say "required='yes'" on a parameter definition, which means you will automatically get an error message if you mistype the parameter name. I don't think this is available yet for stylesheet parameters, but it will come... Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Pass node to template, Karl J. Stubsjoen | Thread | Re: [xsl] Pass node to template, S Woodside |
Re: [xsl] combining multiple xml fi, G. Ken Holman | Date | [xsl] Where is the style sheet?, Hugh Dixon |
Month |