Subject: Re: [xsl] The best option? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:21:44 +0100 |
> Hello, I'm a beginner XSLT programmer and I'm wondering what's the best > option to make XSLT work in almost navigators(IE, Netscape, Opera,...) XSLT is built in to mozilla, netscape and IE so you don't need to do anything special for those. XSLT just works. It is not bult in (and as far as i know can not be added) to Opera. An alternative is to transform your files on your machine, either as a command line process or part of the server, and then serve the generated html files. then the end users' browser does not ever see the xml and does not need to know anything about xslt. so this will work with any browser. In practice this is the most common usage, although it does mean that you are missing out on the original motivation for the development of XML, to be able to serve documents over the web, and have them be displayed by the client. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] The best option?, Fran | Thread | RE: [xsl] The best option?, Fran |
Re: [xsl] Using variables to determ, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Using variables to determ, David Carlisle |
Month |