Re: [xsl] Re: XPATH

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: XPATH
From: "poppe chris" <pc_poppe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:26:08 +0100
As I mentioned, i was having a Xpath issue but thought that this list would have enough expertise to solve it even if it wasnt about xslt.

The fact that I'm using BSDL an extension on xml Schema didnt make it easier on you guys,
anyway my problem is solved and in the future I will only use this list for what its supposed to, XSLT :)

thanks for the attention,
greetings Chris

From: davec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Cramer)
Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xsl] Re: XPATH
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:38:13 -0500

I'm wondering if the person is actually asking a Schema question--how do I write a schema to assure that this element has the same value as that element? I think they were hoping that XPath would provide a way of enforcing such a condition . . .

Dave Cramer

On 17 Nov 2003 at 18:02, poppe chris wrote:

I'm facing the following problem, it deals with xpath but I really hope I
can solve it withouth xslt (so maybe this isnt the right place to post it)

I have the following code <xsd:element name="SUBSTREAM"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="SUBSTREAM_length" type="xsd:short"/> <xsd:element name="SUBSTREAM_interior" type="mctf:Sub"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element>

and I want to add the following:

<xsd:simpleType name="Sub">
<xsd:restriction base="bs1:byteRange">
<bs2:length value="SomeXPathExpressionToSUBSTREAM_length"/> </xsd:appinfo>

 so i need help with that XPATH expression, cause i think its similar to
 the xpath in xsl no?

XSL-List info and archive:

XSL-List info and archive:

_________________________________________________________________ Ken je het magazine Glamo al?

XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread
  • [xsl] Re: XPATH
    • yguaba - Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:42:42 -0200
      • <Possible follow-ups>
      • poppe chris - Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:57:19 +0100
      • poppe chris - Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:26:08 +0100 <=