Subject: [xsl] Using Extension Functions - Its Efficiency From: "Pramodh Peddi" <peddip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:16:58 -0500 |
I am using JDK1.4 API for Transformation, which uses Xalan-Java internally. Is it a good idea using Extensions functions in Java language. I found myself very uncomfortable when I have complicated string processing in xsl. So, I am implementing those in Java language and calling them from XSLs. I also use Xalan's built in functions, like tokenize(), when ever available. Is that a bad practice? Does it add any performance hit? And is it bad memory-wise? Any suggestions would be appreciated! Thanks, Pramodh. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Can one stylesheet handle, kakridge | Thread | RE: [xsl] Can one stylesheet handle, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Re: Useful open-source XML/XS, yguaba | Date | RE: [xsl] Using Extension Functions, Joshua Allen |
Month |