Subject: RE: [xsl] increment value - philosophy From: Strolia-Davis Christopher Contr MSG/MAT <Christopher.Strolia-Davis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:18:42 -0500 |
Anoop, G. Ken Holman said: > I would NOT try to solve the problem using recursion. Although I DID give an example of recursion, I would agree with Ken here. "I don't think recursion is the answer." When I made that suggestions, I was just throwing out possibilities, and although it is possible to do something this way, I have a strong feeling that there is a much better way. Anyway, I recommend listening to (reading?) Ken on this one. Chris Strolia-Davis Database Specialist Contractor - CDO Technologies Inc. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] increment value - philoso, G. Ken Holman | Thread | RE: [xsl] increment value - philoso, Strolia-Davis Christ |
RE: [xsl] Question about "for-each , Kenny Akridge | Date | RE: [xsl] Node-sets using <xsl:with, Michael Kay |
Month |