Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:31:04 +0000 |
Hi David, It's good to see some specific comments on XSLT 2.0's weaknesses. > But string manipulation is not convenient in XSLT 2.0. It is as > messy as in perl, just without the rest of perl to compensate for > the mess (I am only mentioning perl because the working draft for > XSLT 2.0 does). String manipulation in XSLT 2.0 is certainly inadequate for some of the up-translations that you might want to do, such as parsing non-regular languages such as HTML or LaTeX (both of which might reasonably appear embedded within an XML document). In these cases, using Perl (or another language) to pre-parse the embedded language into XML structures seems a very reasonable way to proceed. Did you have any other tasks in mind where the string-manipulation support in XSLT 2.0 is inadequate? > Grouping is not easy with XSLT 1.0; but XSLT 2.0 makes it better for > a pre-selected subset of grouping tasks; and my grouping problems do > not always match the tools XSLT 2.0 provides; instead of keeping the > semantic simple and developing optimization and collaboration > techniques, XSLT 2.0 forces the programmer to use algorithms > hardwired in the implementation. Can you expand on the kinds of grouping problems that you have that <xsl:for-each-group> can't handle? I'm not particularly enamoured with <xsl:for-each-group> myself, and it sounds as if you have another design in mind; what is it? > Dates are a problem. It is an open question whether non-XML data > should be processed by XSLT or by another tool colaborating with > XSLT; I admit there are can be various approaches. But for me > personally, it is not a question whether handling dates should be ad > hoc functionality fixed in the language. It should not. If stemming > of English words is not supported by XSLT, why parsing of English > dates does? Pragmatically, I think XPath 2.0 does the right thing by having date/duration arithmetic support built into the language. In EXSLT, the date-related functions are among the most commonly used; "how do I insert the current date/time into my document" is one of the most frequent FAQs. Note that XSLT 2.0's date support comes via XPath 2.0, which is itself based on XML Schema, which is based on ISO 8601. ISO 8601 dates are different from "English dates"; XSLT 2.0 has support for formatting such dates using various calendars and languages, but you have to write your own code (probably using <xsl:analyze-string>) to parse them. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, David Tolpin | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, David Tolpin |
RE: [xsl] Get all the node as text, Kenny Akridge | Date | Re: [xsl] template matching, David Carlisle |
Month |