Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Counting nodes efficiently From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:32:21 -0000 |
-----Original Message----- From: Wendell Piez At 05:22 PM 2/19/2004, you wrote: >I hope that the right term will prevail through being more frequently used. Me too. "Forward walk?" Controlled tree walk? Since its the control that aids the task? Is it relevant that its forwards, since the only requirement is that it visits every node carrying its load of the information needed? <grin/> A parameterised tree walk? regards DaveP (caught up in Wendells wordsmithing :-) - DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Table <br/> conversion, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Counting nodes ef, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Re: Re: Re: Counting nodes ef, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] Table <br/> conversion, Andrew Welch |
Month |