Subject: Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors - W3C schemas only? From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 09:13:41 -0500 |
# # Of course, unless _someone_ other than Michael Kay. steps up and
# implements XSLT2, there may never be an XSLT2 at all, I think it would
# be hard to get out of CR if all but one XSLT implementor boycots XSLT2
# and stays at XSLT1.
#
I'm reasonably confident, reading between the lines, that two or three other implementations are in progress. But don't expect people to announce products until the specs get to CR: no-one wants to be in the WD-xsl position of having to support a draft that turned out not to be as final as they thought it would be.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL, Celio Cidral Junior | Thread | [xsl] Can anyone give me the list o, Bill Riegel |
AW: [xsl] unsuspected output, Nikolas Nehmer | Date | RE: [xsl] Tricky White Spaces being, Karl J. Stubsjoen |
Month |