Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 and implementation of fn:idref in Saxon 7.9 From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:20:28 -0000 |
This is what XSLT 2.0 section 4.4 says: The data model allows attribute nodes to have type annotations derived from schema processing. It is also possible for a limited set of type annotations (on attributes only) to be derived from DTD-based validation of a source document. Because the construction of the data model is outside the scope of XSLT processing, this specification (in common with [Data Model]) neither requires nor prevents this. However, it also says that type annotations are allowed only in a schema-aware processor. There are public comments affecting this, so this could still change. Michael Kay # -----Original Message----- # From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl- # list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Colin Paul Adams # Sent: 15 March 2004 11:49 # To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 and implementation of fn:idref in Saxon 7.9 # # >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> writes: # # Michael> No, the idref() function operates fine (at least in # Michael> Saxon) with DTD-defined IDREF and IDREFS attributes. The # Michael> need to determine which attribute contains the IDREF # Michael> exists just as much in a DTD world as a schema world. # # But as I read the draft standard, it is not allowed to assign a type # of IDREF if using DTD validation rather than schema validation. # -- # Colin Paul Adams # Preston Lancashire # # XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 and implementati, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | [xsl] copying problem, poppe chris |
Re: [xsl] Getting rid of a namespac, Emmanuil Batsis (Man | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl and xml CDATA or Not , John Hamman |
Month |