Subject: RE: [xsl] Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) Challenge From: Michael Müller-Hillebrand <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:37:27 +0100 |
On 18.03.2004 (10:20 Uhr +0000), Andrew Welch wrote: >Heres a potential solution... [...] >This is linear, so hopefully you can use it. Please post back any >comments/improvements. Andrew, That is great. I can't even see a difference in performance between my 4 and 256 row test tables! It is always below two seconds! I removed the code that came from my width-collecting requirement and will post the rest as a general table normalization stylesheet in a different post for easier retrieval ("Table Normalization"). Now with 2 seconds (XSL) against 32 seconds (Omnimark) it looks like a clear win. Thanks a lot! I learned a lot, too! - Michael -- _____________________________________________________________ Dipl.-Ing. Michael M|ller-Hillebrand "Mehr Effizienz f|r Wissensarbeiter" --> http://cap-studio.de
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Table Normalization, Michael Müller-Hille | Thread | RE: [xsl] Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) , Olivier Collioud |
[xsl] Table Normalization, Michael Müller-Hille | Date | RE: [xsl] centralised alphabetical , Jarno.Elovirta |
Month |