RE: [xsl] performance and the xsl:for-each-group instruction

Subject: RE: [xsl] performance and the xsl:for-each-group instruction
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:16:02 -0000
I would expect the performance to be fairly similar. Muenchian grouping is
pretty efficient, it's hard to improve very much on it. The big advantage of
xsl:for-each-group (at least with the group-by option) is usability, not
performance.

Michael Kay 

# -----Original Message-----
# From: Gruenewald, Terry [mailto:tgruenewald@xxxxxxxxxx] 
# Sent: 24 March 2004 21:00
# To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# Subject: [xsl] performance and the xsl:for-each-group instruction
# 
# Does the xsl:for-each-group instruction have a performance 
# benefit over using the Muench method, or is it just syntactic 
# candy?  I've been testing xsl:for-each-group against the 
# Muench method in Saxon 7.8 and I don't see any performance 
# gain.  It would make sense (at least to me) that 
# xsl:for-each-group could operate much more efficiently than 
# the Muench method since it knows what you want to do is group.  
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 

Current Thread