Subject: RE: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional language From: "Kenny Akridge" <kenny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:08:00 -0500 |
I'm just curious- what specifically makes you believe that XPath is not functional? And when I say XPath, I am referring to the spec, not an implementation. -----Original Message----- From: Colin Paul Adams [mailto:colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:05 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional language >>>>> "David" == David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> writes: David> Note this is the wrong list really; if you want to change David> the draft, post a comment to public-qt-comments@xxxxxx I know. I thought I'd sound out opinions first. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |