Subject: Re: [xsl] Grouping problem - Duplicates From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 09:52:21 -0400 |
>The second is, that this solution is product-dependent. By using the >xalan:nodeset function, it limits the solution to a certain product. >Is there no other way that would be generic? (This is for me a requirement). There is no fully portable solution in XSLT 1.0. You can make this slightly more portable by using the EXSLT node-set extension function instead. EXSLT is a "standard non-standard" set of extension functions which is supported by a number of XSLT processors, Xalan among them. It isn't fully generic, but at least it improves the odds that your processor will understand the request. The truly generic solution will be XSLT 2.0, where the distinction between node sets and source trees and result tree fragments will be eliminated. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman, IBM Next-Generation Web Technologies: XML, XSL and more. "The world changed profoundly and unpredictably the day Tim Berners Lee got bitten by a radioactive spider." -- Rafe Culpin, in r.m.filk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Grouping problem - Duplic, Sarah | Thread | Re: [xsl] Grouping problem - Duplic, Sarah |
RE: [xsl] xsl:value-of select after, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Grouping problem - Duplic, Jacoby, Peter R. |
Month |