Subject: Re: [xsl] ancestor axis order From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 15:18:34 +0100 |
> Shouldn't that be self::define? not if you are asking if the nearest such ancestor is a choice > then 'requires' there be a choice nearer the document root. no we're in ancestor axis step so [1] means nearer the ref element. > Since I now know that choice is never an ancestor of define, in which case Ken's version works as you can't have define choice define ref David -- The LaTeX Companion http://www.awprofessional.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=0201362996 http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0201362996/202-7257897-0619804 ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] ancestor axis order, David . Pawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] ancestor axis order, David . Pawson |
RE: [xsl] ancestor axis order, David . Pawson | Date | RE: [xsl] ancestor axis order, David . Pawson |
Month |