Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt processors From: david_n_bertoni@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:21:23 -0700 |
> xml size=2MB > XalanC transforms it ok, but speed is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc. > Parsing/transforming time is 1:2. So when I run Xalan, it tooks about > 8 sec to initialize and 15 sec to transform. > > xsltproc transform it ok with speed 4-5 times faster than XalanC. > Parsing/transforming time is about 1:1 (3 and 4 seconds) > > > xml size=17MB > XalanC transforms it ok, but speed is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc. > Parsing/transforming times are 20/60 sec. > > But xsltproc initialization tooks very long time (after 5 minutes I > have killed that process). Well, if you can make the document public, you can always create a bug report in the Xalan-C bug system, and someone will take a look at the performance issue. It's possible we could fix it in the next release, or even provide a patch for a current release. http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10582 By the way, I'm not sure how you can report that Xalan-C is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc for the 17MB file when you killed the process after 5 minutes! That doesn't make any sense at all. Can you elaborate more? Dave
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xslt processors, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt processors, Dusan Zatkovsky |
RE: [xsl] xslt processors, Pieter Reint Siegers | Date | [xsl] Seeking XSL projects in Charl, Marty McKeever |
Month |