Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort with msxml english language, danish characters, weird results From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:04:10 +0100 |
> Michael Kay wrote: > > > The UCA is written as if there is a single correct > > answer, but there isn't. > > The UCA doesn't define a particular collation sequence for any > languages, rather it defines the requirements for how collation > mechanisms should allow you to define the collation rules for a given > language and script. Yes, I should have made that clear. But it doesn't handle things like collating ISO-646 before ISO-10646, which is what you will often find phone books and back-of-book indexes doing. Michael Kay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with msxml engli, W. Eliot Kimber | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with msxml engli, W. Eliot Kimber |
Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with msxml engli, W. Eliot Kimber | Date | [xsl] xsl:call-imports?, Mario Caprino |
Month |