Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling problem From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:43:31 +0100 |
> I need to do some grouping? yes you are doing the classic example of "positionl grouping" so since you are using 2.0 you could use teh grouping constructs. However I didn't understand your comment > How, for exasmple, > would I also handle a situation where I have: > > bullet 1a > bullet 2a > bullet 2b > bullet 1b > bullet 2c > bullet 2d as I thought that was exactly the case described earlier. each level 1 element checks if the immediately following thing is a level 2 and if it is it starts a list and then processes that level 2. a level 2 node has to process itself then process any immediately following level 2 so the end result is that any consecutive sequence of level 2s ends up in the list started on the level 1 David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] following-sibling problem, Bruce D'Arcus | Thread | Re: [xsl] following-sibling problem, Bruce D'Arcus |
RE: [xsl] following-sibling problem, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] output .net register dire, Jan Limpens |
Month |