Subject: Re: [xsl] Windows URLs From: Joern Clausen <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:00:52 +0100 |
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:07:22PM -0000, Michael Kay wrote: > There are no rules. The "file:" URI scheme appears to be very poorly > documented, and its mapping onto various operating system file naming > schemes is even less well documented. Documentation and adherance are two different things. In the aftermath of rfc2396bis, there is currently discussion on uri@xxxxxx about documenting several URI schemes, including file:. Speak now, if you want to have current practice documented. Joern -- Joern Clausen joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Faculty of Technology http://www.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE/~joern/ University of Bielefeld, Germany +49 (0)521/106-2494
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Windows URLs, Geert Josten | Thread | RE: [xsl] Windows URLs, Wendell Piez |
[xsl] XSLT - update attribute with , Ann Marie Rubin | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT - update attribute w, David Carlisle |
Month |