Subject: RE: [xsl] RE: [SPAM] - RE: [xsl] RE: [SPAM] - Re: [xsl] characters in xsl - Bayesian Filter detected spam - Bayesian Filter detected spam From: "Bradley, Peter" <PBradley@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:31:55 -0000 |
Nope. I haven't got it. Never mind. I'll go back to the spec and do some reading. If I still can't work it out, I'll perhaps ask again. Thanks for trying. Sorry for being so dumb! Cheers Peter -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 11 November 2004 16:29 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: [SPAM] - RE: [xsl] RE: [SPAM] - Re: [xsl] characters in xsl - Bayesian Filter detected spam - Bayesian Filter detected spam So, if I say: <xsl:template match="//stone"> ... </xsl:template> I specify a template for every <stone> element regardless of where it appears in the file? yes, although <xsl:template match="stone"> would match the same elements. It's never useful to start a match pattern with //. Meaning that: /stone and /stone/*/stone would activate the same template? Is that right? I don't understand this last part. /stone and /stone/*/stone are very different expressions and woul dselect different nodes in a select expression and match different nodes if used in a match pattern. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: [SPAM] - RE: [xsl] RE, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: [SPAM] - RE: [xsl] RE, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] characters in xsl, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: [SPAM] RE: [xsl] RE: , David Carlisle |
Month |