Subject: RE: [xsl] alternative to FO? From: "Pawson, David" <David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:08:27 -0000 |
-----Original Message----- From: Bruce D'Arcus For those with experience with FO, the latest from TeX guru Hans Hagen may of interest. http://www.pragma-ade.com/show-mag-9.htm Is it just me, or is his xslt flaky? page 3 etc;, <xsl:stylesheet version='1.0' xmlns:xsl='http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform' xmlns:fx='http://www.pragma-ade.com/rlg/foxet.rng' output='xml' charset='UTF-8'> He's using xsltproc, if that makes a difference. What's the output= and charset= attributes all about? I didn't *think* they were standard. regards DaveP -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] alternative to FO?, Jirka Kosek | Thread | RE: [xsl] alternative to FO?, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XML Data Islands, XML Men, Shawn | Date | AW: [xsl] Documenting XSLT Styleshe, Huditsch Roman |
Month |