Subject: RE: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2.0? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:09:47 -0000 |
> So why not have two schemas from the XSLT 2.0 WG: the current one with > all bells and whistles and a much simpler one that will be easily and > immediately dropable in most of today's not so clever schema-oriented > text editors? Someone can do it, but I don't enjoy writing code to work around the undocumented limitations of buggy products, so I'm happy to leave that to someone else. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2., M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2., Peter Gerstbach |
Re: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2., M. David Peterson | Date | [xsl] EXSLT implementation in .NET, Karl Stubsjoen |
Month |