Subject: Re: [xsl] OT (browser standards) From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:26:19 -0800 |
best, -Rob
Hi David, The new standard errort you are refering (http://www.whatwg.org/) seems to aim to standardize new widgets like RTF controls, menus and toolbars etc..
Its a nice effort..
But we already have lot of standards like HTTP 1.1,
HTML 4, XML 1.0, XSLT 1.0, SSL 3.0 etc.. First,
implementation of these should be uniform acrosss
browsers..
I feel, many of the specs implemented are uniform across major browsers(I would say 65%). Probably, W3C should make a list of things which are not uniform(studying themself, and by taking user feedbacks) and submit that list to MS, Mozilla, Opera to be implemented! MS can release patches for IE, as it practices today. I am not sure, whether W3C charter permits this activity.. Probably yes.. It will surely benifit users..
Regards, Mukul
--- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The "Web Browser Framework standard" could include something like following list as minimum set of features that should be same(including spec versions like HTTP 1.1, XSLT 1.0 etc) across all browsers -
the chance of getting xslt in a minimum agreed set of features is I would say zero. Opera, Safari and my mobile phone don't do xslt and I don't see any sign of them doing so in the foreseeable future.
If you want to see what one subset of browser implementors thinks is core browse around
http://www.whatwg.org/
David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] OT (browser standards), Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] OT (browser standards), Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] changing value of select , António Mota | Date | [xsl] xslt to generate XSL-FO table, Ilya Sterin |
Month |