Subject: Re: [xsl] Sorting network addresses From: Craig W <codecraig@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:17:36 -0500 |
It could be. That's strange. Thanks. On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:10:00 -0500, Jim Neff <jneff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm using version two and I got the correct output (each network address > once). Maybe something wrong with XMLSpy's parser? I'm using Saxon 8.1. > > --Jim Neff > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Craig W [mailto:codecraig@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 9:12 AM > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [xsl] Sorting network addresses > > > > well, i changed the xslt version from 2.0 to 1.0 and i get > > the correct output....i wonder why? FYI, XMLSpy be default > > uses its own XSLT engine (for either 1.0 or 2.0), or you can > > specify that it uses Microsoft's XML parser, or you can have > > it use some other XSL transformation program that you specify. > > > > Anyway, thanks for the help....it would still be nice to know > > why version 2.0 is acting differently. > > > > -Craig > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:05:20 GMT, David Carlisle > > <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ....now do u get what i get? > > > no I get: > > > > > > $ saxon ip2.xml ip2.xsl > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <networks> <network> > > > <address>1.1.1.1</address> </network> <network> > > > <address>2.3.1.2</address> </network> <network> > > > <address>170.5.2.4</address> </network> </networks> > > > > > > But I just noticed that you are specifying XSLT2 (although > > you don't > > > have any xslt2 specific features) so I'll try with saxon8: > > > > > > I get same: > > > > > > $ java -jar ../saxon8/saxon8.jar ip2.xml ip2.xsl <?xml > > version="1.0" > > > encoding="UTF-8"?> <networks> <network> <address>1.1.1.1</address> > > > </network> <network> <address>2.3.1.2</address> </network> > > <network> > > > <address>170.5.2.4</address> </network> </networks> > > > > > > > To repeat how I did it, > > > > open the XML document, go to the "XSL/XQuery" > > > > > > sorry that would mean downloading xmlspy first which is too much:-) > > > > > > What processor does it use for XSLT2 ? > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > __ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. > > The service > > > is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > > > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the > > globe, visit: > > > http://www.star.net.uk > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > __ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.codecraig.com > > http://jroller.com/page/codecraig > > -- http://www.codecraig.com http://jroller.com/page/codecraig
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Sorting network addresses, Jim Neff | Thread | Re: [xsl] Sorting network addresses, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Sorting network addresses, Craig W | Date | Re: [xsl] Sorting network addresses, David Carlisle |
Month |