Subject: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default From: Daniel O'Donnell <daniel.odonnell@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:26:01 -0700 |
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL DOCTYPE, Kevin Rodgers | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, JBryant |
[xsl] XSL DOCTYPE, c p | Date | [xsl] RE: Operational system date, Daniel O'Donnell |
Month |