[xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default

[Daniel O'Donnell <daniel.odonnell@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
	I have a question that calls for informed opinion: is there a reason 
for not using xslt 2.0 for most processing tasks? I'm thinking 
especially privatish, and pre-processed things rather than on-the-fly 
commercial applications.
	The standard is now pretty stable, correct? and the processors seems to 
be working well. Saxon 8b-3 is very good, and since Saxon 6.5.3 has a 
bug that seems to stop it writing properly in Service pack two XP 
machines, it may be a good time to switch anyway.
	No doubt a trivial question, but I'd be interested in hearing what 
people think. I'm engaged in a couple of new project involving xslt 
where the question of 1.0 or 2.0 is real.
-dan
--
Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD
Associate Professor of English
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
Tel. (403) 329-2377
Fax. (403) 382-7191
E-mail <daniel.odonnell@xxxxxxxx>
Home Page <http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/>
The Digital Medievalist Project: <http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/>