Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:47:35 +0000 |
Hmmm, since i'm not a english native *and* not a MS expert, the "terrific" here is a good thing or a bad thing? It's "terrific" in the sense of "terror" or in the sense of "uau!". Or simply putting it it's :) or :( ? Now we're using a IIS with asp on it, but i'll prefer a platform agnostic thing. The upgrade(?) a "normal" asp to asp.net is straithforward? On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:36:04 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > One way would be to upgrade to ASP.NET with its terrific XML support, and > use Saxon.NET which supports XSLT 2.0. > https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxondotnet/ > > NB1: Saxon.NET is an OS effort to port the great Saxon product to .NET and > Mono. All functionality offered has its origin in Saxon, therefore all > credits go to its creator, Michael Kay. > > NB2: Saxon.NET is still an early beta product, and is currently about 25% > slower than using Saxon (on Windows). There is a workaround to this - you > can spawn processes in ASP.NET which run Saxon transformations in the > background and return to you the output, which is the same as running Saxon > from the command line, and thus has the same performance. > > Cheers, > <prs/> > http://www.pietsieg.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, Pieter Reint Siegers | Thread | Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, JBryant |
Re: [xsl] alternate row color in a , Jason Trépanier | Date | Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, António Mota |
Month |