Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files

[JBryant@xxxxxxxxx]

:)

"terrific" = good

Its root is the Latin terrere, to frighten. English (and I suppose other
languages) has an interesting way of reversing the meanings of some
adjectives over time. This is one of those adjectives. One informal use of
"bad" means good, too. And "awful" and "awesome" have traded meanings from
what they had about 5 centuries ago.

Now that I am WAY off topic....

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)




Antsnio Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx>
03/10/2005 02:47 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files






Hmmm, since i'm not a english native *and* not a MS expert, the
"terrific" here is a good thing or a bad thing? It's "terrific" in the
sense of "terror" or in the sense of "uau!".

Or simply putting it it's   :)    or    :(   ?

Now we're using a IIS with asp on it, but i'll prefer a platform
agnostic thing. The upgrade(?) a "normal" asp to asp.net is
straithforward?


On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:36:04 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
<pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One way would be to upgrade to ASP.NET with its terrific XML support,
and
> use Saxon.NET which supports XSLT 2.0.
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxondotnet/
>
> NB1: Saxon.NET is an OS effort to port the great Saxon product to .NET
and
> Mono. All functionality offered has its origin in Saxon, therefore all
> credits go to its creator, Michael Kay.
>
> NB2: Saxon.NET is still an early beta product, and is currently about
25%
> slower than using Saxon (on Windows). There is a workaround to this -
you
> can spawn processes in ASP.NET which run Saxon transformations in the
> background and return to you the output, which is the same as running
Saxon
> from the command line, and thus has the same performance.
>
> Cheers,
> <prs/>
> http://www.pietsieg.com