Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files

Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:56:51 +0000
I'll go talk to our administration guy to try to know if there is
allready a asp.net in the server, as i think they allready develop in
asp.net, but it's not really my domain...

I'll get back to you later if i need some help installing Saxon.NET.
But i still wold prefer Java...

Thanks a lot.


On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:18:12 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
<pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> :)
>
> ASP.NET and ASP can coexist on one web server. And it's not that platform
> specific as you think it is (yes, classic ASP was, but that goes for many
> script languages, even today) - since the .NET Framework is built on an
ECMA
> standard (the CLI - see
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-335.htm)
> you'll easily find your way to Linux and Mac OSX through Mono compatible
> projects. Develop in Windows and deploy almost anywhere, I'd say.
>
> To stay on the XSLT 2.0 track, MS will not add any XSLT 2.0 until there is
a
> stable W3C Rec available - at least that is what I've picked up until now -
> so that's why we've started the Saxon.NET effort. Although early and a bit
> slow I'd say it is a wonderful step forward.
>
> Cheers,
> <prs/>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antsnio Mota [mailto:amsmota@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 02:48 p.m.
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
>
> Hmmm, since i'm not a english native *and* not a MS expert, the "terrific"
> here is a good thing or a bad thing? It's "terrific" in the sense of
> "terror" or in the sense of "uau!".
>
> Or simply putting it it's   :)    or    :(   ?
>
> Now we're using a IIS with asp on it, but i'll prefer a platform agnostic
> thing. The upgrade(?) a "normal" asp to asp.net is straithforward?
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:36:04 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
> <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > One way would be to upgrade to ASP.NET with its terrific XML support,
> > and use Saxon.NET which supports XSLT 2.0.
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxondotnet/
> >
> > NB1: Saxon.NET is an OS effort to port the great Saxon product to .NET
> > and Mono. All functionality offered has its origin in Saxon, therefore
> > all credits go to its creator, Michael Kay.
> >
> > NB2: Saxon.NET is still an early beta product, and is currently about
> > 25% slower than using Saxon (on Windows). There is a workaround to
> > this - you can spawn processes in ASP.NET which run Saxon
> > transformations in the background and return to you the output, which
> > is the same as running Saxon from the command line, and thus has the same
> performance.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > <prs/>
> > http://www.pietsieg.com

Current Thread