Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:56:51 +0000 |
I'll go talk to our administration guy to try to know if there is allready a asp.net in the server, as i think they allready develop in asp.net, but it's not really my domain... I'll get back to you later if i need some help installing Saxon.NET. But i still wold prefer Java... Thanks a lot. On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:18:12 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > :) > > ASP.NET and ASP can coexist on one web server. And it's not that platform > specific as you think it is (yes, classic ASP was, but that goes for many > script languages, even today) - since the .NET Framework is built on an ECMA > standard (the CLI - see > http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-335.htm) > you'll easily find your way to Linux and Mac OSX through Mono compatible > projects. Develop in Windows and deploy almost anywhere, I'd say. > > To stay on the XSLT 2.0 track, MS will not add any XSLT 2.0 until there is a > stable W3C Rec available - at least that is what I've picked up until now - > so that's why we've started the Saxon.NET effort. Although early and a bit > slow I'd say it is a wonderful step forward. > > Cheers, > <prs/> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Antsnio Mota [mailto:amsmota@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 02:48 p.m. > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files > > Hmmm, since i'm not a english native *and* not a MS expert, the "terrific" > here is a good thing or a bad thing? It's "terrific" in the sense of > "terror" or in the sense of "uau!". > > Or simply putting it it's :) or :( ? > > Now we're using a IIS with asp on it, but i'll prefer a platform agnostic > thing. The upgrade(?) a "normal" asp to asp.net is straithforward? > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:36:04 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort > <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > One way would be to upgrade to ASP.NET with its terrific XML support, > > and use Saxon.NET which supports XSLT 2.0. > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxondotnet/ > > > > NB1: Saxon.NET is an OS effort to port the great Saxon product to .NET > > and Mono. All functionality offered has its origin in Saxon, therefore > > all credits go to its creator, Michael Kay. > > > > NB2: Saxon.NET is still an early beta product, and is currently about > > 25% slower than using Saxon (on Windows). There is a workaround to > > this - you can spawn processes in ASP.NET which run Saxon > > transformations in the background and return to you the output, which > > is the same as running Saxon from the command line, and thus has the same > performance. > > > > Cheers, > > <prs/> > > http://www.pietsieg.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, Pieter Reint Siegers | Thread | RE: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, António Mota | Date | RE: [xsl] current-group () function, Michael Kay |
Month |